Tee hee. I'm using some controversial* issue as an excuse to let a bunch of people see me half naked. This makes it okay. And noble. I'm not like some slut who does it for fun or money.
* They always pick some safe issue like "don't wear fur" or "don't kick puppies". Something that doesn't risk hurting their career. Don't hold your breath waiting for the "I'd rather go naked than wear leather/GMO cotton" campaign.
So sick of PETA and the whole anti-fur crowd. With the exception of the more exotic pelts most of the fur from animals today are raised on farms just like cows, pigs, sheep, and chickens.
Did you know in 2010 PETA received 2,345 animals? They killed 2,200. I thought (according to PETA at least) humans weren't in any place to intervene in animals lives? Also they support ALF which is more or less a group of terrorists (by definition aleast). The vice president of PETA is also diabetic and uses medicine that was created by animal testing. Her excuse is she needs it to live and fuck you. Fuck PETA and fuck any brainwashed dolt, fuckhead who supports them. Angry 13 year old on a sugar high rant, out.
#6 you took the words right out of my mouth. These women just use peta as a facade for reasons to get naked. And if they really would rather be then they wouldn't be blocking any parts of their bodies it'd be controversial to show.
Being for animal rights itself isn't bad. Being for peta is being for an extremist organization that would hurt humans if it helped their cause, that is willing to use scare tactics to further itself. Peta can kiss my ass while I put on my leather coat.
NOT NAKED nude COVERED! Let's stop saying a person is naked when you don't know if they have pasties or nipple covers of some sort most likely had a modesty thong or wearing a Cuchilla since most of the pics are photo shopped severely. If they are going to try and shock the world DO IT! Don't "hide" behind or NOT show the bits that are supposedly naked, it IS false advertising. I realize it's PETA who is NOT known for being to bright, since they're basically terrorists, but c'mon they should be able to do nude properly. They do propagandize animals being really stripped naked, at least for the sake of the poor helpless animals do it right and be a humanitarian and really show up & be photographed naked, if PETA can bomb and terrorize people they should be able to convince an actress to do the same. After all it is ART?
When PETA starts showing the "I'd rather be DPed by two angry thugs who wash my eyebrows in bro' sauce afterwards" campaigns, let me know.
Until then, I call this teen-boy tease shit pathetic. All the vegan girls like it because it feeds their fantasies that they look that good. And patethetic vegan fanboys whack it to photoshops, yet again. Some sorry shit right there. That chick takes it from a guy who eats steak, is my bet, not a whispy-bearded, patcholi-wearing, chicken-armed vegan type.
Why doesn't she rather fade into irrelavant obscurity than tryin to hold onto her last second of fame only to be a bitch and not even go full naked for Peta? Bet u she misses hosting that lame ass G4 show. How's that Daily Show working out for you bitch?! Whomp whomp
Celebs who pose for Peta are idiots. Peta kills more animals than just about any other organization. Total hypocrites in it for the money. The killed 98.3% of the animals they received in 2010.
F*ck all the bullshit, she looks sexy to me especially her feet. Her hair reminds of me "Audrey Thorn" from Twin Peaks, total hottie, great show, rushed series finale IMO
31 Comments:
Leave Your CommentSo much shop it doesnt even look like her...
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 04:52:39
She is not naked or nude or anything. I can't see nip or bush so she's not naked.
Show the goods or sotp this crap
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 05:32:34
This half a chink is showing no wool, so i am going to fuck a poodle
By BEN STERN,SHUT UP SIT DOWN , on January 13, 2012 05:42:06
Photoshop Awards.
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 05:59:18
Yes, some photoshopping, but still a smoking hot girl...one that would never do me :(
By AJB, on January 13, 2012 06:06:34
Tee hee. I'm using some controversial* issue as an excuse to let a bunch of people see me half naked. This makes it okay. And noble. I'm not like some slut who does it for fun or money.
* They always pick some safe issue like "don't wear fur" or "don't kick puppies". Something that doesn't risk hurting their career. Don't hold your breath waiting for the "I'd rather go naked than wear leather/GMO cotton" campaign.
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 06:16:51
So sick of PETA and the whole anti-fur crowd. With the exception of the more exotic pelts most of the fur from animals today are raised on farms just like cows, pigs, sheep, and chickens.
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 06:58:42
Did you know in 2010 PETA received 2,345 animals? They killed 2,200. I thought (according to PETA at least) humans weren't in any place to intervene in animals lives? Also they support ALF which is more or less a group of terrorists (by definition aleast). The vice president of PETA is also diabetic and uses medicine that was created by animal testing. Her excuse is she needs it to live and fuck you. Fuck PETA and fuck any brainwashed dolt, fuckhead who supports them. Angry 13 year old on a sugar high rant, out.
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 07:38:10
She's a hypocrite. What about the beaver fur that she wears everyday?
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 08:06:51
I'd rather go naked than wear fur.
I'd rather wear fur than see you naked.
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 08:27:26
Why not stay as a bunny, turn her into a bunny, and hump like rabbits?
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 08:28:59
Mmmm I love half chinks.
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 08:38:02
#6 you took the words right out of my mouth. These women just use peta as a facade for reasons to get naked. And if they really would rather be then they wouldn't be blocking any parts of their bodies it'd be controversial to show.
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 09:20:57
Being for animal rights itself isn't bad. Being for peta is being for an extremist organization that would hurt humans if it helped their cause, that is willing to use scare tactics to further itself. Peta can kiss my ass while I put on my leather coat.
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 09:23:29
So we should send fur coats to Oliva to finally see her naked?
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 09:53:33
I don't know... I'd like to fuck the stuffing out of her. Or maybe stuff the fucking...
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 10:27:24
Well, her sit-com bombed, so she has to get back into the spotlight somehow.
By KMB, on January 13, 2012 11:59:43
This chick is so fucking meh it's not even funny. GTFO slaphead!
By coolpapa, on January 13, 2012 12:19:27
Meat is murder! Murder sure tastes good!
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 12:29:47
NOT NAKED nude COVERED!
Let's stop saying a person is naked when you don't know if they have pasties or nipple covers of some sort most likely had a modesty thong or wearing a Cuchilla since most of the pics are photo shopped severely.
If they are going to try and shock the world DO IT! Don't "hide" behind or NOT show the bits that are supposedly naked, it IS false advertising.
I realize it's PETA who is NOT known for being to bright, since they're basically terrorists, but c'mon they should be able to do nude properly. They do propagandize animals being really stripped naked, at least for the sake of the poor helpless animals do it right and be a humanitarian and really show up & be photographed naked, if PETA can bomb and terrorize people they should be able to convince an actress to do the same. After all it is ART?
C'MON!!!
By A Man Named GOB, on January 13, 2012 17:45:56
I'd rather she go naked instead of fur than go covered nudity for publicity!
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 18:29:44
do people seriously think she has a pretty face? fuuggg
By anonymous, on January 13, 2012 20:56:17
I'll bet that bunny would taste great ,fried or baked!
By BudFocker, on January 14, 2012 12:19:04
Decent body, wierd face, bizarre personality. I've had better...
By anonymous, on January 14, 2012 15:27:59
When PETA starts showing the "I'd rather be DPed by two angry thugs who wash my eyebrows in bro' sauce afterwards" campaigns, let me know.
Until then, I call this teen-boy tease shit pathetic. All the vegan girls like it because it feeds their fantasies that they look that good. And patethetic vegan fanboys whack it to photoshops, yet again. Some sorry shit right there. That chick takes it from a guy who eats steak, is my bet, not a whispy-bearded, patcholi-wearing, chicken-armed vegan type.
Bro' sauce on eyelids or don't bother.
By anonymous, on January 14, 2012 17:55:28
Why doesn't she rather fade into irrelavant obscurity than tryin to hold onto her last second of fame only to be a bitch and not even go full naked for Peta? Bet u she misses hosting that lame ass G4 show. How's that Daily Show working out for you bitch?! Whomp whomp
By anonymous, on January 15, 2012 03:30:37
Celebs who pose for Peta are idiots. Peta kills more animals than just about any other organization. Total hypocrites in it for the money. The killed 98.3% of the animals they received in 2010.
By Amy, on January 15, 2012 12:19:31
F*ck all the bullshit, she looks sexy to me especially her feet. Her hair reminds of me "Audrey Thorn" from Twin Peaks, total hottie, great show, rushed series finale IMO
By anonymous, on January 15, 2012 13:36:56
I have two cats. Would she be willing to go home with me and get naked for being good to my pets?
By anonymous, on January 16, 2012 15:50:11
Pass the puscuits.
By Ada Bigun, on January 17, 2012 01:18:30
todd i thought u werent into asian chicks
By anonymous, on January 19, 2012 02:39:48
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com